Jurisdiction

From OSHKY Knowledge Library
Revision as of 14:30, 20 April 2018 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with the intro blurb and categorized as Compliance.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Determining whether KYOSH or federal OSHA has jurisdiction when enforcing occupational safety and health laws within the borders of Kentucky is almost always a clean-cut decision. However, there are cases where it can be confusing and not quite black-and-white. Scenarios where this confusion can arise include navigable waterways, federal installations or properties, and during the construction of bridges. In fact, the determination of jurisdiction can become so complicated that both federal and state inspectors conduct a joint investigation until a decision can be determined.

This article attempts to show the lines that have been established between federal and state jurisdictions by summarizing some common scenarios. [and maybe not-so-common ones?]

IMPORTANT: A primary document for the establishment of these jurisdictional lines is a 2007 Memorandum of Understanding between the US DOL and the KYOSH program. This should be consulted if any questions arise concerning jurisdiction. This MOU is a clarification of 29 CFR 1952.230.

Area of Jurisdiction

Past Instances of Hairy Jurisdictional Issues